Do I need a Second Photographer?
When planning your wedding photography, you might notice the option to add a second photographer. But what does this entail, and do you really need two photographers at your wedding? The short answer is no—you don’t need two photographers.
However, there are significant benefits to having a second photographer for your wedding. This doesn’t mean that a solo photographer can’t capture everything you want on your big day. I never tell couples they absolutely need a second photographer.
I’ve been a solo shooter for the majority of the weddings I’ve covered, and trust me, solo photographers are more than capable of telling your story beautifully. But recently, having a second photographer has become more popular. Magazines, wedding blogs, and even your friends might insist it’s essential, but how do you decide?
This post will highlight some benefits of having a second photographer for your wedding and scenarios where I’d recommend it. Remember, if your budget doesn’t allow for a second photographer, don’t stress!
What are the main benefits of having a second photographer at your wedding?
More final images in your gallery! While quality is key, having one photographer means we can’t be in two places at once. If you want both sides of the morning preparations captured (especially if you’re in different locations), a second photographer is invaluable. You get to see each other’s preparations after the wedding in your gallery. More coverage = more final images!
Different angles of crucial moments. With an additional angle, we can capture your partner’s reaction as you walk down the aisle or get multiple perspectives of your first kiss. One of us can take a wide shot of your ceremony from the back while the other focuses on close-up details like ring exchanges and smiles during the vows.
Candid shots of guests during couple portraits. While we’re off taking couple portraits, the second photographer can capture candid shots of your guests, informal group photos, and details of the reception decor. This gives the main photographer more time to focus on you, ensuring all moments are covered without feeling rushed.
Coverage for large weddings and venues. If your wedding is big or spread out, a second photographer can ensure no moments are missed. If Uncle Dave decides to break out his dance moves while I'm photographing table settings across the venue, having another photographer means we won’t miss a thing.
Extra help and creativity. Sometimes I want to try a shot that requires more assistance, and having a second shooter is incredibly helpful. They can hold a light, fluff a dress, throw a veil, or help hang a dress in a tricky spot. It also means more creative ideas and varied shots.
What if I don’t have the budget for a second photographer?
Budget concerns are valid, and adding another photographer can seem daunting. But this post isn’t about pushing you to hire a second photographer. If you only want your partner’s preparations captured, consider staggering your prep times so the main photographer can cover both. Often, we can quickly move between locations to get those important shots.
A second photographer is mostly recommended for larger weddings and venues. For smaller, intimate weddings, one photographer is usually enough. If you’re having a small elopement, a single photographer will do just fine. For large weddings, a second photographer helps ensure no one is missed.
When considering your wedding photography, think about the size and spread of your venue, as well as your budget. A second photographer can enhance your coverage, but it’s not a necessity for every wedding.
As always, just drop me a message if you want to know anything more about hiring a second shooter, including prices. Options are available for coverage for part or all of your day!
